The Adam-and-Eve war continues at Bryan College

This post from over at Why Evolution is True brought up some points I have long wondered about with christianity; If people claim to believe that Adam and Eve and the garden are all just metaphorical, how does the rest of the boat that is the religion stay afloat?

Why Evolution Is True

To those who claim that there’s no incompatibility between science and religion, read this:

Bryan College is a small, conservative Christian school in Dayton, Tennessee, deliberately placed in the town that hosted the 1925 Scopes Trial, and where the school’s namesake, William Jennings Bryan (who was one of those testifying against Scopes for teaching human evolution), died shortly after the trial.

As I’ve posted before (here and here), the College is in a ferment over a topic close to my heart: the historicity of Adam and Eve.  It turns out that the college’s recent insistence that faculty and staff swear to an oath affirming that historicity is tearing the college apart. Even conservative Christians, it seems, have trouble believing that Adam and Eve were the literal ancestors of humanity.  That historicity has become increasingly problematic since the appearance of new papers in population genetics, showing that over the last few…

View original post 1,265 more words

Feminism, TV

Big Bang Feminist Bust

A zinger from Big Bang Theory. Image found on
A zinger from Big Bang Theory. Image found on

A coworker and I have had a back and forth of “you seriously need to watch [enter show here]!” She has wanted me to watch Big Bang Theory because I’m the office nerd who often takes things exceedingly literally. And I’ve wanted her to watch the YouTube channel Feminist Frequency because she has brought up a lot of really cool feminist observations that really make me think about things.

So we made a TV pact to watch the respective shows today. I watched the first (read: earliest) episode I could find on where some episodes of the show is streamed in full. That first episode was Workplace Proximity (Season 7, Ep. 5).

While I have seen the show a couple times in the past so I’m vaguely familiar with the characters enough to be entertained by their nerdly antics and copious references… this one episode was perhaps a horrible one to “start” on, particularly given the feminist/nerd context of the TV pact.

Continue reading

morality, reason, religion

Pondering… Morality

The Thinker, bronze sculpture by Auguste Rodin. Photo by “Karora,” taken 13 August 2007, released to the public domain. Retrieved from wikimedia commons.

It’s been an odd week so far. Crazy, yet sympathetic, tin-foil hat person on Monday, disturbing dream on Tuesday that kept distracting me, and today… well, today was contemplative. Contemplative is, for me, decidedly in the “good day” category, but that doesn’t make the day a simple one.

Anyway, got to the end of the day and got into a fun conversation with someone. Started off as politics, then migrated to the topic of groups which feel entitled to act against other groups (in this case, we were talking about radical environmental groups who sue the government to enforce their ideals of what use public lands should be put to), and that eventually got us on the topic of religious law versus social or formal law.

Though we never really talked about it in so many words, a good deal of our conversation centered on the concept of objective versus subjective morality. Oddly enough, he from a religious perspective argued the subjective side, while I from the atheistic perspective argued the objective morality side. Stereotypically, that set-up is reversed with the believer arguing for the existence of an objective (god-given) morality and the atheist arguing for a subjective (culturally-based/situationally-based) morality.

It was a very stimulating conversation, however, like so many of the sort, amounted to little more than running on the mental treadmill; energizing and works some muscles, but doesn’t get you anywhere.

Continue reading


File this one under “movie is better than the book”

So those possible movie reviews I mentioned? Yeah…

Movie poster of Noah from
Movie poster of Noah from

I saw Noah. I originally wasn’t planning to since my “smug, pseudo-intellectual” reaction was to ignore it as just another in a long line of epic wastes of money trying to chase Mel Gibson’s bloodfest, The Passion. It wasn’t. Yay!

The origins of the base story aside, this one started out very much like the other grand visual epics based on ancient legend. We get introduced to some text on the screen exposition wherein the set-up of the world is presented nicely and neatly. Garden of Eden. Tempting. Downfall. Humans cast out. Cain kills Able… and there is where the familiar old saw ends.

Cain—juxtaposed to his younger brother Seth—flees his family and begins creating cities and industry, while the decedents of Seth are some form of hunter/gatherer nomads who live in hippyish commune with nature. Ask no questions about how they did so (what with no sisters being mentioned for incestuous begetting) because you will get none, but instead move on to the outset of the actual story with Noah and family.

Noah and Co. are seemingly the last remaining decedents  of Seth. Noah proceeds to get confusing visions of scary shit (mostly death) and goes looking for his wizard/hermit/wiseman grandfather to help him sort out what it all means. Along the way they encounter Hermione and titans. OK, in the movie they are called “Watchers,” but for all intents and purposes, they are titans. Giant ancient creatures who were there before time (sort of) and have a mixed relationship with the humans.

The call to create the ark comes, some cool (and rather sensible) retcons of the “physics” of the classic Noah story are employed with the animals, and then all hell breaks loose. The hordes of Cain’s decedents aren’t keen on getting drowned, so their leader leads them on an attack on Noah’s construction site. Following that first-act action, what follows is a slow—by standard action/fantasy movie standards—second and third act that hinge entirely on emotional turmoil in the characters over the morality of what occurred (i.e. mass genocide) and some anti-hero-spawned character drama with Noah and his family. I think it could have been better (and, seriously, what can’t?) but it worked and I liked it.

Continue reading

atheism, reason, religion

Mission: The “Good Book”

Here’s my NIV bible I received back when I was going through confirmation. Note the pink, blue and orange sticky notes. The orange notes on the side are my notes to myself, the blue are notations of when god did something good, and the pink are notations of when god did something evil. I plan to do the same for satan/the devil along the bottom once that character shows up in the story, but thus far he’s not been introduced.

I have accepted the mission, set by my curiosity in my fellow human, to re-read the bible. My goal is to try to understand why its legions of followers have dubbed it the “Good Book.”

Now, I have read it before, though it was a long time ago. I read the entire book—cheating a bit by skipping all the “begats” portions—when I was going through confirmation when I was about 11. We were instructed to read the bible, and so I did. It did not take long before the overwhelming details of  god commanding death, war, genocide, rape, slavery, torture and otherwise doing or ordering his followers to do some decidedly evil shit that I decided there was a problem. I went to my pastor with questions, and he said to read the bible, as it would answer my questions, so I pressed on.

Long story short, I read it, had ten times more questions at the end than I had early on when I questioned him, the paltry answers I got were in no way satisfying, and ultimately I realized none of what I’d been told in church or read in the bible made any sense.

TL;DR: Read bible –> become atheist.

Continue reading


[Enter obligatory first post here]

Hello internet, this is the Admiral. Admiral Yrrek. No, it is not my real name, but you should have figured that out already. This is the internet and that’s my online name.

Anyway, at the behest of a friend and the desire to have a public soapbox where I can post and share my thoughts in long form other than by using Facebook Notes, I’ve decided to restart this old blog. I plan to write about things that interest me and I’ve wanted to write short (or not) essays or the like about. As the name of the blog might suggest, these things will likely fall into those categories of things you’re not supposed to bring up in polite company or, dare I say it, discussed with the family at holiday dinners. Politics, religion, sexual topics (i.e. sexual orientation topics, gay rights, the gender/sex difference, gender/sexual rights, etc.), culture, language, media, and so on. Who knows, I might even write movie reviews.

Continue reading